|
Topic
Detail :
COMMENT : Case 1: Consistently
Low Glucose and low C-peptide
Dr V.Parameswaran,
Diabetes and Endocrinology Services,Royal
Hobart Hospital, Australia,June
2006
General
comments and Diagnosis:
Proinsulin is the precursor to Insulin. When insulin is
released in vivo, proinsulin is enzymatically cleaved to
produce equimolar amounts of insulin (A & B chain) and
C-peptide (connecting peptide). In insulin dependant
diabetics where serum insulin levels are affected by
insulin therapy, C-peptide measurements can provide some
idea of residual endogenous insulin secretion by the
pancreas. Residual insulin secretion in IDDM is referred
to “honeymoon” period and is a result of regeneration of
pancreatic B cells. In some cases, the “honeymoon”
period can last from a few months to a few years thus
requiring no insulin therapy during this time.
C-peptide levels can also be used to
diagnose those patients who self administer insulin when
not required. In these cases, endogenous pancreatic
suppression leads to subnormal or suppressed C-peptide
levels.
Comments
on case 1: The negligible
C-peptide levels in this patient, at the time of
hypoglycaemia, exclude insulinoma. In insulinoma,
C-peptide levels will be high or inappropriate to the
glucose. The hypoglycaemia in
this patient was due to exogenous insulin
administration. The diagnosis is factitious
hypoglycaemia. The patient eventually confirmed this
although initially denying it.
Additional Comments:
Pituitary or adrenal failure, eg Addison’s, results in
lower glucose levels and can lead to increased insulin
sensitivity (eg
¯
insulin release). However, persistent hypo’s like in
this patient despite withdrawal of insulin therapy for a
week makes self administration of insulin likely.
Comments on other questions raised in
the case: (1)
Laboratory artefact: This
is not the case since low C-peptide levels were
consistently obtained. Additionally, in our hands,
antibody specificity variations have lead to higher
measured immunoactive C-peptide rather than low levels.
(2) Insulinoma and glucose,
insulin and C-peptide levels:
The characteristic laboratory finding
in Insulinoma is always
insulin and C-peptide and
¯
glucose levels. In most cases, these patterns are
clear-cut but it is important to appreciate that in some
cases the relative levels of insulin, C-peptide to
glucose could be suttle. Therefore appropriateness of
relative levels has to be considered eg insulin or
C-peptide and glucose ratios.
IDDM
and NIDDM results patterns:
Generally, in IDDM, C-peptide and Insulin levels are low
or ND and glucose is high. In NIDDM, all parameters are
high.
Clinical
usefulness of C-peptide:
Please see general comments and diagnosis section. In
addition, C-peptide is also useful in picking up those
cases of surreptitious administration of oral
hypoglycaemic agents. In these instances, both C-peptide
and insulin levels measured will be high in the presence
of low glucose.
Diagnostic
investigation for insulinoma:
The golden standard method that is safe and
sensitive is the 72 hour fast. This is done under strict
supervision in a hospital setting. Prolonged fasting
will gradually drop glucose levels causing pancreatic
secretion to switch off. In a patient with insulinoma,
the switching off does not occur hence resulting in
inappropriate C-peptide or insulin relative to the
falling glucose levels. This is because insulinomas are
autonomous.
Question June 2006
A 50 year old
lady was on thyroxine replacement therapy for
hypothyroidism. On a number of clinical follow-up
visits, she had puzzled the registrars with regards to
her unusual thyroid function test results. The
registrars felt clinically she was euthyroid or possibly
hypothyroid. The following typical results are offered
for your comments:
fT4: 23 pmol/L
(NR: 10 – 24)
fT3: 5.0 pmol/L
(NR: 2 – 6)
TSH: 15 mIU/L
(NR: 0.4 – 4)
What is the
cause of these discrepant results? Please offer possible
explanatory comments.
Note : The answer to this
question may be emailed to Dr Parmeshwaran at
venkat.parameswaran@dhhs.tas.gov.au
For Last
Months case Comment by Dr Parmeshweran :
CLICK HERE
|